Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research

32Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As healthspan and lifespan research breakthroughs have become more commonplace, the need for valid, practical markers of biological age is becoming increasingly paramount. The accessibility and affordability of biological age predictors that can reveal information about mortality and morbidity risk, as well as remaining years of life, has profound clinical and research implications. In this review, we examine 5 groups of aging biomarkers capable of providing accurate biological age estimations. The unique capabilities of these biomarkers have far reaching implications for the testing of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions designed to slow or reverse biological aging. Additionally, the enhanced validity and availability of these tools may have increasingly relevant clinical value. The authors of this review explore those implications, with an emphasis on lifestyle modification research, and provide an overview of the current evidence regarding 5 biological age predictor categories: Telomere length, composite biomarkers, DNA methylation “epigenetic clocks,” transcriptional predictors of biological age, and functional age predictors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lohman, T., Bains, G., Berk, L., & Lohman, E. (2021). Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211046419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free