Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Evaluating the aerosolization of droplets from surgical instruments to assess the implications of surgery in SARS-CoV-2 transmission for both patients and providers. Cadaver study. Outpatient surgery center. Aerosolized particles between 0.3 and 25 microns were measured. Instruments tested included monopolar cautery with and without suction, bipolar cautery, a bipolar vessel sealing device, and tissue scissors. Each trial was compared to a background reading. Monopolar cautery without suction, Ligasure used continuously and Bipolar cautery produced the most aerosols. Monopolar cautery with simultaneous suction produced no detectable aerosols. Ligasure used for a single cycle produced notably fewer aerosols than during continuous use. Most aerosols produced were < 5 microns. These data support n95 use during surgical management of the upper aerodigestive tract, as well as the use of suction in the surgical field.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Low, G. M. I., LeConte, B., Eguia, A. A., Kim, A., Karni, R. J., Luong, A. U., & Jain, K. S. (2022). Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 74, 3145–3150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02872-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free