The Paradox of Coding — Policy Concerns Raised by Risk-Based Provider Contracts

  • Landon B
  • Mechanic R
16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The medical claims that health care providers submit to insurers generally include a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, which describes the medi- cal, surgical, or diagnostic service provided to the patient, as well as a series of International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes. Un- der fee-for-service reimbursement, health care organizations and in- surers have traditionally focused on accurate CPT coding to ensure that reimbursement matches the services provided. In recent years, however, the medical diagnoses listed in claims have taken on in- creasing importance as capitated and risk-based payment systems have begun to use these codes to adjust the payments made to health plans and providers. The purpose of risk adjustment is to ensure that health plans that enroll sicker patients and provid- ers who care for such patients are compensated fairly. Health plans participating in Medicare Advan- tage, for example, are reimbursed at higher rates for enrolling peo- ple with multiple conditions and more complex diagnoses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landon, B. E., & Mechanic, R. E. (2017). The Paradox of Coding — Policy Concerns Raised by Risk-Based Provider Contracts. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(13), 1211–1213. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1708084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free