High reliability in respiratory rate assessment in children with respiratory symptomatology in a rural area in Mozambique

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Early recognition of severe medical conditions is often based on clinical scores and vital sign measurements such as the respiratory rate (RR) count. We designed this study to determine the reliability of RR assessment counted three times during a full minute by independent observers in children in a developing country setting. A total of 55 participants were enrolled in the study. Participant ages ranged from 10 days to 7 years (median 22 months). Agreement for RR count was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97). Agreement for presence of tachypnea was also high (Kappa coefficient of 0.83, p<0.001). However, a single reading would have misclassified 5-11% of the participants as non-tachypneic. Repeated RR counts offer reliable results if done during a full minute. Patients not fulfilling tachypnea criterion but with a high RR count should have the measurement repeated. © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lanaspa, M., Valim, C., Acacio, S., Almendinger, K., Ahmad, R., Wiegand, R., & Bassat, Q. (2014). High reliability in respiratory rate assessment in children with respiratory symptomatology in a rural area in Mozambique. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 60(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmt081

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free