Collective action and labour militancy interrupted: Back-to-work legislation and the state of permanent exceptionalism at Air Canada

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using data collected from survey responses and interviews conducted in 2014, this study examines the consequences of back-to-work legislation from the perspective of customer service workers at Air Canada represented by Unifor Local 2002. By examining union attitudes, opinions of strikes, wildcat actions and back-to-work legislation deployed in 2011 and 2012, the study concludes that this type of legislation functioned to protect the interests of the employer in an ongoing process of corporate restructuring. Such ad hoc legislative measures, defined by political economists as ‘permanent exceptionalism’, further undermines the industrial pluralist regime that is the foundation of Canadian labour relations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, A., & Templeton, A. (2020). Collective action and labour militancy interrupted: Back-to-work legislation and the state of permanent exceptionalism at Air Canada. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 41(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16682306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free