Combined mathieu and snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: A prospective randomized study

16Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of combined Mathieu and Snodgrass urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair and to compare them with the two techniques separately. Methods: Between January 2006 and February 2009, patients with distal hypospadias were prospectively randomized to undergo one of the three following urethroplasty techniques: Mathieu urethroplasty, Snodgrass urethroplasty or a combination of the two. Operative time, intraoperative, early and late postoperative complications were reported for each procedure. Results: 101 patients were included in this study. The Mathieu technique was used for 30 patients, Snodgrass repair was carried out in 37 patients and 34 patients underwent the combined technique. Operative time ranged from 43 to 120 min. Eight patients developed urethrocutaneous fistulae. Meatal stenosis was encountered in five cases. Thirty-seven patients had rounded meatus, while a slit-like urethral opening was found in 64 cases. Conclusions: In our hands, the combined Mathieu and Snodgrass urethroplasty technique provided a better cosmetic outcome than the Mathieu technique with no incidence of meatal stenosis as seen with the Snodgrass technique. © 2010 The Japanese Urological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elganainy, E. O., Abdelsalam, Y. M., Gadelmoula, M. M., & Shalaby, M. M. (2010). Combined mathieu and snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: A prospective randomized study. International Journal of Urology, 17(7), 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02537.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free