Institutionalising women’s experiences in law: Possibilities and pitfalls of parliamentary gender audit committees

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Feminist legal scholars have long recognised that law is gendered, being a manifestation of power that often works to the detriment of women. This need not be the case. This article tests the capacity of law to make a material difference on women’s lives through parliamentary auditing. The arguments springboard from an innovation emerging in Tasmania in 2022: a Gender and Equality Audit Committee in the Tasmanian Legislative Council. Alongside the Australian Capital Territory’s Standing Committee on the Economy and Gender and Economic Equality, these Australian examples provide a framework to interrogate the possibilities for inclusive, gendered legislative scrutiny.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vijeyarasa, R. (2024). Institutionalising women’s experiences in law: Possibilities and pitfalls of parliamentary gender audit committees. Alternative Law Journal, 49(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X241253001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free