Etonogestrel contraceptive implant uptake and safety among solid organ transplant recipients

4Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the safety of etonogestrel contraceptive implant use among reproductive-age women who are solid organ transplant recipients. Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with matching of reproductive-age women (14–45 years) who were solid organ transplant recipients and received care at a tertiary medical center in Denver, Colorado between 2011 and 2019. We identified cases who used an etonogestrel contraceptive implant post-transplant and then matched controls (no hormonal contraceptive use) in a 1:1 ratio according to age, transplant type, and institution. We compared pregnancy patterns, post-transplant infections, immunosuppressant therapy adjustments, and graft complications between cases and controls. We also evaluated implant-related side effect profiles and continuation rates among cases only. Results: We identified 24 cases and 24 matched controls. When compared to age and transplant organ-matched controls, contraceptive implant users were not at increased risk for adverse transplant-related outcomes. Graft rejection was the most common transplant-related complication in both groups (n = 11, 45.8% cases; n = 10, 41.7% controls). Additionally, outcomes concerning pregnancies, infections and immunosuppressant therapy changes showed no statistically significant difference between either group. Conclusions: This study provides the first data that the etonogestrel contraceptive implant is likely a safe contraceptive option for reproductive-age women who are solid organ transplant recipients. Given the solid organ transplant recommendations to avoid pregnancy during the first 1 to 2 years post-transplant, healthcare providers should continue to counsel solid organ transplant recipients at risk of pregnancy on the etonogestrel contraceptive implant as an effective and safe method of pregnancy prevention. Implications: Reproductive age women who are solid organ transplant recipients face additional health risks with unintended pregnancies. The etonogestrel contraceptive implant remains a safe and effective method of contraception for this specific population, with no increase in graft-related complications among contraceptive implant users.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lew, J., Sheeder, J., & Lazorwitz, A. (2021). Etonogestrel contraceptive implant uptake and safety among solid organ transplant recipients. Contraception, 104(5), 556–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free