Invited commentary: Fewell and colleagues - Fuel for debate

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Concern over the impact of flawed measurement continues to nag epidemiology. Early studies indicated that the impact of measurement error is benign, leading generally only to attenuation of associations; more recent research has documented that this impact, especially within the setting of multivariate modeling, cannot be expected always to be benign. It can, for example, be a source of unsettling inconsistency. Fewell and colleagues (Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:646-655) show that residual confounding is especially persistent in the presence of multivariate confounding. © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marshall, J. (2007, September). Invited commentary: Fewell and colleagues - Fuel for debate. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free