Abstract
Concern over the impact of flawed measurement continues to nag epidemiology. Early studies indicated that the impact of measurement error is benign, leading generally only to attenuation of associations; more recent research has documented that this impact, especially within the setting of multivariate modeling, cannot be expected always to be benign. It can, for example, be a source of unsettling inconsistency. Fewell and colleagues (Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:646-655) show that residual confounding is especially persistent in the presence of multivariate confounding. © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Marshall, J. (2007, September). Invited commentary: Fewell and colleagues - Fuel for debate. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm173
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.