Complications of laparoscopy in connection with entry techniques

47Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The anatomy of the human being has not changed. However, technical developments in operating materials and methods call for improvements in surgical procedures as well as the management of complications. A fundamental distinction between any operating method and laparoscopy is that, in the latter, the initial entry is usually performed in blind fashion. Blind entry may result in vessel or organ damage, especially in patients who have undergone previous surgery. One of the difficulties associated with the entry is that the damage may not be identified immediately and then necessitate major abdominal repair. Furthermore, the improvement of surgical instruments and techniques enables the surgeon to perform even major operations by the laparoscopic approach. This is associated with renewed learning curves and a high rate of complications due to vascular, bowel, uterine, or bladder damage. The improvement of surgical techniques must be accompanied by advancements in the management of complications. The aim of this review is to address the risks of laparoscopy as well as their correct and professional management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alkatout, I. (2017, June 1). Complications of laparoscopy in connection with entry techniques. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2016.0111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free