Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling

151Citations
Citations of this article
255Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Energy costs and environmental standards encouraged cement manufacturers world-wide to evaluate to what extent conventional fuels can be replaced by alternative fuels, i.e., processed waste materials. Clinker burning is well suited for various alternative fuels. In order select a suitable alternative fuel, a commercial modelling tool (ASPEN PLUS®) is used to model the four-stage pre-heater kiln system of a full-scale cement plant (clinker production ~2900 tons/day), using petcoke as fuel. The goal is to optimise process control and alternative fuel consumption, while maintaining clinker product quality. Calculations with varying amounts of different fuels are compared with a reference case. The dependence of process performance on the amount of combustion air is clearly demonstrated and the energy demand of the process could be predicted for varying fuel mixes. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kääntee, U., Zevenhoven, R., Backman, R., & Hupa, M. (2004). Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling. Fuel Processing Technology, 85(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00203-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free