Abstract
Energy costs and environmental standards encouraged cement manufacturers world-wide to evaluate to what extent conventional fuels can be replaced by alternative fuels, i.e., processed waste materials. Clinker burning is well suited for various alternative fuels. In order select a suitable alternative fuel, a commercial modelling tool (ASPEN PLUS®) is used to model the four-stage pre-heater kiln system of a full-scale cement plant (clinker production ~2900 tons/day), using petcoke as fuel. The goal is to optimise process control and alternative fuel consumption, while maintaining clinker product quality. Calculations with varying amounts of different fuels are compared with a reference case. The dependence of process performance on the amount of combustion air is clearly demonstrated and the energy demand of the process could be predicted for varying fuel mixes. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kääntee, U., Zevenhoven, R., Backman, R., & Hupa, M. (2004). Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling. Fuel Processing Technology, 85(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00203-0
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.