SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Schreyger F
  • Scharioth G
  • Baatz H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL((R)) implant versus the T-Flux((R)) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL((R)) in one eye and T-Flux((R)) in the contralateral eye. RESULTS: In eyes with SKGEL((R)) the IOP decreased from 20.6+7.3 mm Hg to 14.8+5.3 mm Hg (-5.8 mm Hg or -28.1%), and in eyes with T-Flux((R)) from 19.9+7.2 mm Hg to 14.7+3.3 mm Hg (-5.2 mm Hg or -26.1%, no statistically significant difference, p >0.05). Antiglaucoma medications with either implant decreased from initially 2.0+0.8 to 0.3+0.7. A qualified success was found in 17/17 eyes with T-Flux((R)) and in 16/17 eyes with SKGEL((R)). Complete success was achieved in 14/17 eyes with T-Flux((R)) and in 13/17 eyes with SKGEL((R)). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering effect and safety of SKGEL((R)) and T-Flux((R)) seem to be comparable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreyger, F., Scharioth, G., & Baatz, H. (2008). SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up. The Open Ophthalmology Journal, 2(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free