MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: Correlation with CT and sonography

78Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fourteen patients with portal venous thrombosis (PVT) diagnosed by CT and/or sonography were studied with MR. Three of the 14 had portal hypertension. The MR findings were compared with those of eight patients with portal hypertension, but without CT or sonographic evidence of PVT. MR imaging showed portal venous thrombosis in all 14 PVT cases. Intraluminal thrombi of less than 5 weeks duration appeared markedly hyperintense relative to liver and muscle on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Older thrombi appeared hyperintense relative to liver and muscle in eight of 11 cases, but only on T2-weighted images. MR showed thrombi in 11% more portal vessels than did CT (MR = 30, CT = 27) and in 28% more vessels than did sonography (MR = 32, sonography = 25). MR also showed 24% more collateral vessels than did CT (MR = 31, CT = 25) and 50% more vessels than did sonography (MR = 33, sonography = 22). Third-echo images (echo time = 96 msec, repetition time = 1500-2150 msec) verified the presence of venous thrombi in 28 (93%) of 30 PVT vessels, and they differentiated flow-related intravascular signal from true thrombi in six (17%) of 36 portal hypertension vessels. We conclude that MR is a valuable tool for imaging portal vein thrombosis. MR is a good substitute for CT and can be more informative than sonography.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zirinsky, K., Markisz, J. A., Rubenstein, W. A., Cahill, P. T., Knowles, R. J. R., Auh, Y. H., … Kazam, E. (1987). MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: Correlation with CT and sonography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 150(2), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.2.283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free