Comparison of different antithrombotic regimens for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation

96Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is unknown. Methods and Results: The 622 consecutive AF patients undergoing DES implantation were prospectively enrolled. Among them, 142 patients (TT group) continued triple antithrombotic therapy comprising aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin after discharge; 355 patients (DT group) had dual antiplatelet therapy; 125 patients (WS group) were discharged with warfarin and a single antiplatelet agent. Target INR was set as 1.8-2.5 and was regularly monitored after discharge. The TT group had a significant reduction in stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) (8.8% vs 20.1% vs 14.9%, P=0.010) as compared with either the DT or WS group. In the Cox regression analysis, administration with warfarin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.77; P=0.002) and baseline CHADS2 score ≥2 (HR 2.09; 95%CI 1.27-3.45; P=0.004) were independent predictors of MACCE. Importantly, the incidence of major bleeding was comparable among 3 groups (2.9% vs 1.8% vs 2.5%, P=0.725), although the overall bleeding rate was increased in the TT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the TT group was associated with the best net clinical outcome. Conclusions: The cardiovascular benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy were confirmed by reducing the MACCE rate, and its major bleeding risk might be acceptable if the INR is closely monitored.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, F., Zhou, Y. J., Wang, Z. J., Shen, H., Liu, X. L., Nie, B., … Yu, M. (2010). Comparison of different antithrombotic regimens for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation Journal, 74(4), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0880

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free