Evaluation of two warming systems after cardiopulmonary bypass

Abstract

We have compared the Thermomat electric under-mattress (JMW Systems, Edinburgh, UK) and the Bair Hugger (Augustine Medical, Courtelary, Switzerland) forced-air warming blanket in 30 adult patients after cardiac surgery. All patients were warmed to an oesophageal temperature of 38°C before termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); those with oesophageal temperatures < 35.5°C at skin closure were allocated randomly to be rewarmed in the intensive care unit either on the Thermomat (n = 15) or under the Bair Hugger blanket (n = 15), at their highest settings. Oesophageal and lateral thigh skin temperatures were recorded every 15 min for 4 h. There was a significantly faster increase in core temperature (0.5 vs 0.75°C h-1; P < 0.0002) and skin temperature (0.86 vs 1.3 °C h(-1); P < 0.001) in the Bair Hugger group. However, there was no difference in the number of patients who reached a core temperature of 36°C (15 Bair Hugger, 14 Thermomat) or 37°C (11 Bair Hugger, seven Thermomat), or in the number of patients who reached a skin temperature of 37°C in 4 h (four Bair Hugger, one Thermomat). Twelve patients in the Bair Hugger group reached a skin temperature of 36°C compared with two in the Thermomat group (P < 0.001). The Bair Hugger warmed faster than the Thermomat both centrally and peripherally, and warmed more patients to a core temperature of 37°C in 4 h, but did not reduce the time to tracheal extubation or alter important clinical aspects of postoperative course.