Endotoxin-Retentive Filters for the Online Preparation of Ultrapure Dialysis Fluid and Non-Pyrogenic Substitution Fluid: A Critical Review and Reference Guide

Abstract

Poor water treatments and concentrates to prepare dialysis fluids favor bacterial growth-producing pyrogens (e.g., endotoxins) that may cross hemodialysis, particularly high-flux, membranes. This puts hemodialysis patients at risk of acute bacteremia, pyrogenic reactions, long-term complications, loss of residual renal function, and poor nutritional status. Consequently, regulatory bodies worldwide recommend using ultrapure dialysis fluid for routine hemodialysis. Requests are also growing for the online production of sterile non-pyrogenic substitution fluid from ultrapure dialysis fluid. This way, large volumes of infusion solution may be safely and economically produced, enabling more end-stage kidney disease patients to benefit from the greater capacity of hemodiafiltration to remove toxins than purely diffusive hemodialysis treatment. Ultrapure dialysis and substitution fluids are often produced upstream from hemodialyzers by online filtration of standard dialysis fluid through cascades of bacteria- and endotoxin-retentive filters (ETRFs). Commercial ETRFs differ for membranes, operation, performance, duration and maintenance protocols, connection to a dialysis machine, disinfection procedures, and replacement schedule. Although suboptimal ETRF choice may increase treatment costs, the difficulty in gathering comparative information on commercial ETRFs complicates their selection. To aid dialysis centers in selecting the most convenient and suitable ETRF for their needs, herein, relevant characteristics of commercial ETRFs are reported and critically reviewed for a quick yet effective comparison.