Safety and efficacy of protected cardiac intervention: Clinical evidence for sentinel cerebral embolic protection

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stroke is a well-documented potential risk of structural cardiac interventions. As a result of the far-reaching burden of stroke on patients, caregivers and the healthcare system, new medical interventions and therapies are being developed to help mitigate this risk. One such intervention is the recently FDA-cleared Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System (Sentinel; Claret Medical, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) designed to capture and remove debris dislodged during transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures. In the SENTINEL IDE Study, and in a more recent all-comers trial, Sentinel significantly reduced periprocedural strokes by 63 and 70 % respectively. In this paper, we review the growing body of evidence supporting the use of Sentinel in transcatheter aortic valve replacement and other endovascular procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schäfer, U. (2017). Safety and efficacy of protected cardiac intervention: Clinical evidence for sentinel cerebral embolic protection. Interventional Cardiology: Reviews, Research, Resources, 12(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2017:19:2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free