The judicial protection of religious symbols in Europe's public educational institutions: Thank god for Canada and South Africa

ISSN: 15544419
0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How should judges deal with the manifestation of religious symbols in public educational institutions? In light of the important role of human rights in our legal and political system, courts should grant maximum protection under the freedom of religion or belief. The central thesis of this article is that the European Court of Human Rights fails to live up to this standard. In order to reach this conclusion, the article analyzes relevant case law of the European Court and compares its case law with that of the high courts of Canada and South Africa. In addition, the article assesses the case law of all three courts from the angle of interpretation theory and particularly Cass R. Sunstein's theory of judicial minimalism. Adoption of a more consistently minimalist methodology by the European Court might lead to a greater protection granted to individuals and groups. However, a wide and deep ruling is first required to overturn the current line of reasoning. The European Court can draw inspiration from Canada and South Africa for such a judgment. Copyright © 2011 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ten Napel, H. M. T. D., & Theissen, F. H. K. (2011). The judicial protection of religious symbols in Europe’s public educational institutions: Thank god for Canada and South Africa. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 8(1).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free