Short-run pain, long-run gain: Financial liberalization and stock market cycles

158Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The views on financial liberalization are quite conflictive. Many argue that it triggers financial bubbles and crises. Others claim that financial liberalization allows markets to function properly and capital to move to its most profitable destination. The empirical evidence on these effects is not robust. This paper constructs a new comprehensive chronology of financial liberalization and shows that a key reason for the inconclusive evidence is that the effects of liberalization are time-varying. Financial liberalization is followed by large booms and busts only in the short run. In the long run institutions improve and financial markets tend to stabilize.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaminsky, G. L., & Schmukler, S. L. (2008). Short-run pain, long-run gain: Financial liberalization and stock market cycles. Review of Finance, 12(2), 253–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfn002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free