Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta: Uncertainties and controversies

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The natural histories of intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are highly variable as they may progress to aneurysm formation, rupture, or dissection, or even resolve, in the specific case of IMH. Imaging plays an increasingly important role in clinical and surgical management of IMH and PAU. In contrast to ulcer-like projections, images of intramural blood pools have not been widely reported in CT studies of patients with IMH. Understanding the imaging characteristics and the natural course of each of these entities would help clinicians and surgeons to identify patients at greatest risk for bad prognosis and may improve outcomes. This paper discusses the pathophysiology of these entities, the controversies regarding their natural history, and the prognostic factors that should be identified in CT scans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, A. H. (2019). Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta: Uncertainties and controversies. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro. Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.180119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free