Editorial: For better or for worse? Intended and unintended consequences of science communication

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, more effort has been devoted to ensuring that scientific knowledge can be mobilised to make a positive impact on individuals and society. Scientists are encouraged, and even required, to communicate their findings beyond academic circles – to inform interested groups. However, there can be challenges with language use and communicating concepts; interpreting results; and from time pressure to communicate results rapidly. Here, we discuss intended and unintended consequences of science communication. We emphasise the importance of training to achieve these communication skills and working with non-academic partners – to mitigate potential harm from misinterpreted results and to ensure that science communication is maximally beneficial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gregory, A. M., Selita, F., & Kovas, Y. (2024, August 1). Editorial: For better or for worse? Intended and unintended consequences of science communication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free