Three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of root resorption in maxillary anteriors following en-masse retraction with varying force vectors – a randomized control trial

5Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Root resorption in orthodontics is associated with direction and magnitude of force application as primary etiological factors. Well-controlled trials that utilize three-dimensional segmentation to detect volumetric changes in tooth structure are required to assess the quantitative nature of root resorption. Objective: To assess the severity of root resorption (RR) during retraction of maxillary anteriors with three different force vectors (with and without skeletal anchorage) via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) superimpositions. Trial Design: Three-arm parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT). Materials and Methods: Forty-two (16 males, 26 females) patients, (17–28 years), in permanent dentition with bimaxillary protrusion were randomly allocated to three groups of 14 patients each using block randomization (1:1:1 ratio) and allocation concealment. En-masse anterior retraction post first premolar extractions was carried out with modified force vectors in the three groups based on anchorage type [Molar, Mini-implant and Infrazygomatic crest (IZC) bone screws]. Volumetric root loss and linear dimensional changes were blindly assessed on initial (T0) and final (T1, end of space closure) CBCT scans. Normality distribution of values was done using Shapiro–Wilk's test. ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD test were done to compare measurements between groups at significance levels (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasanna Arvind, T. R., Ramasamy, N., Subramanian, A. K., Selvaraj, A., & Siva, S. (2024). Three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of root resorption in maxillary anteriors following en-masse retraction with varying force vectors – a randomized control trial. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 27(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free