Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

19Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may offer greater physiological benefits than traditional biventricular pacing (BiVP). However, there are limited data comparing the efficacy of LBBAP vs BiVP in patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the feasibility and electromechanical and clinical outcomes of both LBBAP and BiVP. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies retrieved from various databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL) published up to May 22, 2023. The risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: We included 12 studies with a total of 3004 patients (LBBAP = 1242, BiVP = 1762). Pooled results showed that LBBAP resulted in a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD 0.40, 95% CI 0.25, 0.54, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yousaf, A., Ahmad, S., Peltz, J., Ahsan, M. J., Abbas, K. S., Muhammad, S., … Kim, M. H. (2023). Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm O2, 4(11), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.06.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free