Abstract
Objectives: Composition of implant material and its surface structure is decisive for oral biofilm accumulation. This study investigated biofilm formation on eight different materials. Materials and Methods: Eighteen healthy subjects wore intraoral splints fitted with two sets of eight materials for 24 h: zirconia [ZrO2]; silver-gold–palladium [AgAuPd]; titanium zirconium [TiZr]; Pagalinor [PA]; hydroxyapatite [HA]; silver-platinum [AgPt]; titanium aluminum niobium [TAN]; titanium grade4 [TiGr4]. Total biomass was stained by safranin to assess plaque accumulation while conventional culturing (CFU) was conducted to investigate viable parts of the biofilm. Cell viability of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1) was assessed in vitro. Statistical evaluation was performed with linear mixed-effects models to compare materials (geometric mean ratios, 95% CI), with the level of significance set at ɑ =.05. Results: Less biofilm mass and CFU were found on noble metal alloys (AgPt, AgAuPd, and PA). Compared to AgPt, PA had 2.7-times higher biofilm mass value, AgAuPd was 3.9-times, TiGr4 was 4.1-times, TiZr was 5.9-times, TAN was 7.7-times, HA was 7.8-times, and ZrO2 was 9.1-times higher (each p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Meier, D., Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M., Waltimo, T., Zaugg, L. K., Rohr, N., & Zitzmann, N. U. (2023). Biofilm formation on metal alloys and coatings, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite as implant materials in vivo. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(10), 1118–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14146
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.