Validation of the Medonic CA620/530 Vet 20-μl microcapillary sampler system for hematology testing of feline blood

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare feline hematologic variables in blood collected in microcapillary tubes (20 μl) and conventional blood tubes with the Medonic CA620/530 Vet in-house hematologic analyzer. A comparison of results obtained in 60 cats presented at the clinics of the veterinary school showed that the correlations between the 2 methods were 0.97 for white blood cell, 0.95 for red blood cell, and 0.93 for platelet counts; 0.92 for hemoglobin concentration; and 0.99 for mean corpuscular volume. No clinically relevant differences between the 2 blood sampling techniques were observed for any variable, which suggests that both techniques are interchangeable in cats. Moreover, microcapillary tubes would allow easier repeated sampling in the same cat and would likely be useful in other small species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bourgès-Abella, N. H., Reynolds, B. S., Geffré, A., Braun, J. P., & Trumel, C. (2009). Validation of the Medonic CA620/530 Vet 20-μl microcapillary sampler system for hematology testing of feline blood. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 21(3), 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870902100311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free