The Perils of Leading a Democracy

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Environmental characteristics can influence aging. Democracy results in higher life expectancy for its members. However, there is a lack of research that indicates the influence of democracy on its leaders. Specifically, we examine how the nature of democracy affects the perceived aging of its leaders. In this paper, we capture perceived aging via face perception. We suggest that leaders in a democracy are perceived to age more compared to those in an autocracy. Counter to the common belief that democracies are less stressful, we find that the stress of being a leader in a democracy can have adverse effects. Study 1 uses picture pairs of 268 leaders from across the world, and participants judge age difference in years between the pictures. Study 2, a controlled study, examines downstream influences on the leader’s specific attributes. Results indicate that leaders appearing to age more are more likely to avoid complex decisions, to be less charismatic, and to be less inspiring.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rathee, S., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2021). The Perils of Leading a Democracy. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 92(4), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020912932

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free