Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial

12Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Aims: Current guidelines recommend diphenhydramine in patients undergoing endoscopy who are not adequately sedated with a benzodiazepine and opioid combination. Because this practice has not been adequately assessed, we performed a randomized, double-blind trial comparing diphenhydramine with continued midazolam in such patients. Methods: Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy with moderate sedation were eligible. Sedation was measured with the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score with adequate sedation defined as 3 on a 0- to 5-point scale. Patients not adequately sedated with midazolam 5 mg and fentanyl 100 μg were randomly assigned to diphenhydramine 25 mg versus continued midazolam 1.5 mg. Adequacy of sedation was assessed 3 minutes after each study medication dose. If MOAA/S was 4 to 5, study medication was repeated, to a maximum of 3 doses. The primary endpoint was adequate sedation. Results: The planned enrollment of 200 patients (100 in each study group) was attained. Adequate sedation was achieved less often with diphenhydramine than midazolam (27% vs 65%, difference = –38%; 95% CI, –50% to –24%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sachar, H., Pichetshote, N., Nandigam, K., Vaidya, K., & Laine, L. (2018). Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 87(5), 1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free