Heating capabilities of small fluid warming systems

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Perioperative temperature management is fundamental to ensure normothermia in patients. Fluid warmers, which have become smaller in size over the past few years, can help to maintain a stable body temperature. Potentially, the reduction of the size may influence the heating performance. Methods: Therefore, we tested the effectiveness of enFlow®, Fluido compact® and Thermosens® fluid warmers by measuring the inlet and outlet temperature for room-tempered and ice-cooled saline at flow rates of 25, 50, 75 and 100 ml/min. Results: At all examined flow rates, the tested heating devices warmed up room-tempered saline effectively. The enFlow® provided the significantly (p < 0.05) highest outlet temperature throughout all tested flow rates in comparison to the other devices. When ice-cooled saline was used, the enFlow® maintained a stable outlet temperature > 38 °C at all tested flow rates. The Fluido compact® ensured this only at flow rates of 25 and 50 ml/min, while the Thermosens® provided these conditions at flow rates of 25, 50 and 75 ml/min. Conclusions: The heating capability for room-tempered saline was effective in all tested devices, but with ice-cooled saline enFlow® is superior at high flow rates. At low flow rates the heating capabilities of enFlow®, Fluido compact® and Thermosens® are comparable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zoremba, N., Bruells, C., Rossaint, R., & Breuer, T. (2018). Heating capabilities of small fluid warming systems. BMC Anesthesiology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0565-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free