Sport psychometry, participants and invariance: A critical review

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article presents a critical review of how sporting context variables and participants may affect the validity evidence of measurement instruments. Despite the literature presenting, there is significant effect of gender, age, practice time, length of experience, sporting experience, stages, training loads, competition, as well as socioeconomic and educational level, among other psychological variables, little has been explored about such effects. Recurrent studies have basically reported age, gender and sport. The absence of control of this information in the sporting context and the participant can cause measurement inaccuracy, limitation in application, errors in interpretations and inappropriate interventions, loss of reproducibility and limitations in comparative studies. Furthermore, it prevents analysis of invariance, compromising their stability. Thus, it is urgent and mandatory to tighten the range of indicators that characterize the participants and the context of studies in sports.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rebustini, F., Balbinotti, M. A. A., de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, R. E., & Machado, A. A. (2016, March 29). Sport psychometry, participants and invariance: A critical review. Journal of Physical Education (Maringa). Universidade Estadual de Maringa. https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v27i1.2760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free