Locked in a New Ivory Tower: Beyond Self-Victimization and Depoliticization in Russian Studies

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Drawing on the concepts of “political pilgrims” and “stealth issue advocacy,” this article critiques post-2022 debates surrounding Russian studies, moving beyond the problem of a Russia-centered ontology. It argues that counterhegemonic epistemologies and self-victimizing framings have deflected scholarly attention from Russia’s imperial nationalism and external colonization, while denouncing the West for “Russophobia” or “cancelling” Russia. Meanwhile, comparativists treating Russia as an authoritarian “laboratory” often advance depoliticized research agendas, evading critical engagement with the authoritarian regime. This article calls for Russian studies to engage with Ukrainian and other area studies to overcome self-victimization and overly depoliticized positivist postures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hosaka, S. (2026). Locked in a New Ivory Tower: Beyond Self-Victimization and Depoliticization in Russian Studies. Problems of Post-Communism, 73(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2025.2503886

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free