Zhuangzi and collaboration in animals: a critical conceptual analysis of shared intentionality

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Shared intentionality is a specific form of shared agency where a group can be understood to have an intention. It has been conjectured that humans are better equipped for collaboration than other animals because humans but not other great apes share intentions. However, exporting shared intentionality from a debate about the ontology of mental state attributions like intentions to groups does not seamlessly lend itself to evolutionary science. To explore and de-center the implicit assumptions of Western conceptions of cooperation, I look at Zhuangzi’s philosophy of (in)action. This philosophy treats the actions of individuals as always a form of co-action alongside other agencies to whom one must adapt. Thinking of collaboration as a product of skillful co-action, not shared intention, sidesteps asking about cooperation in “kinds” or levels. Instead, it directs attention to the know-how and behavioral flexibility needed to make our constant coordination adaptive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadopoulos, D. (2023). Zhuangzi and collaboration in animals: a critical conceptual analysis of shared intentionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free