Assessment of Alarm Fatigue Risk Among Oncology Nurses in Jordan

8Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Using technology in the clinical setting where clinical alarms frequently occur, resulting in many false alarms, which is called alarm fatigue, alarm fatigue may increase nurses’ distraction, and that might negatively affect patient safety. Objective: This study aimed to assess alarm fatigue among oncology nurses in Jordan. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used in a non-profit specialized cancer center. A self-reported questionnaire was answered by nurses who participated in the study. Results: A total of 222 questionnaires were analyzed with a more than 95% response rate. More than half of the sample (60.4%) were females. The participants were young nurses with a mean age of 25.18 ± 3.33 years. The total mean score of alarm fatigue was 31.62 ± 7.14 on a scale ranging from zero to 52. Post-hoc analysis showed that the palliative unit (25.73 ± 7.22) and emergency room (28.73 ± 6.62) had low scores of total mean alarm fatigue than remaining area of practice, such as the ICU (33.92 ± 6.99); p-value:.004. Conclusion: Alarm fatigue is a global issue affecting many practice areas. An educational program is recommended for nurses to learn how to deal with alarm fatigue. In order to effectively manage alarms, nurses’ education and individual training are crucial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali Al-Quraan, H., Eid, A., & Alloubani, A. (2023). Assessment of Alarm Fatigue Risk Among Oncology Nurses in Jordan. SAGE Open Nursing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231170730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free