Disability and Bureaucratic Forms of Life

  • Abrams T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper employs a hybrid actor-network theory/phenomenological approach to a frequent bother in the lives of disabled persons: bureaucratic forms. I argue that these forms are key sites where disabled personhood emerges, something I examine through the lens of what philosopher Annemarie Mol calls ‘ontological politics’. To be disabled is to be entered into the bureaucratic form of life. These forms translate human existence into a categorize-able, transportable and combinable object, to be administered through ‘centers of calculation’. Combining Heidegger’s fundamental ontology with Latour’s theory of paperwork, I suggest that these forms represent disability in terms of ‘objective presence’, as a mere pre-existing thing, rather than a human way of being. I conclude with suggestions for further phenomenological research that takes embodied difference as its point of departure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abrams, T. (2016). Disability and Bureaucratic Forms of Life. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 3(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v3i1.2153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free