Surgery versus radiation therapy for stage IB2 cervical carcinoma: A population-based analysis

26Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine outcomes in stage IB2 cervical cancer patients undergoing primary surgery versus radiation. Methods: Stage IB2 cervical cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Public-Use Database from 2000 to 2006. Patients were divided into those receiving radiation (radiation first) or surgery (surgery first) as initial treatment. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: In total, 770 patients were identified with stage IB2 cervical cancer; 369 received radiation, and 401 received surgery initially. The radiation-first group had larger mean tumor size than the surgery-first group (6.0 vs 5.5 cm, respectively; P < 0.0001). The overall survival was longer in the surgery-first group compared with the radiation-first group (72.0 vs 61.4 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery as initial treatment for stage IB2 cervical cancer appear to have improved outcomes in the current era of chemoradiation; however, given the lack of chemotherapy information, a randomized trial will be necessary to see if these results remain valid. Copyright © 2012 by IGCS and ESGO.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rungruang, B., Courtney-Brooks, M., Beriwal, S., Zorn, K. K., Richard, S. D., Olawaiye, A. B., … Sukumvanich, P. (2012). Surgery versus radiation therapy for stage IB2 cervical carcinoma: A population-based analysis. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 22(3), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823f890f

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free