Anatomically and functionally relevant coronary stenoses in patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography but persistent stable angina

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is widely used for the assessment of coronary artery disease and for decision making regarding revascularization. Concerns about possible false negative findings exist. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of stenoses which are both functionally and anatomically significant in patients referred for invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements following a normal SPECT, because of persistent complaints. Methods One hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with normal SPECT were included, with a total of 180 FFR and results measurements. Luminal narrowing of >_70% (>_50% for left main) together with a FFR <0.75. Mean age of the patients was 65, 40% were women. Sixteen percent of the study population had both anatomically and functionally significant stenoses. Besides the use of nitrate, no differences in baseline characteristics, symptoms, coronary history, or pre-test likelihood could be identified for the prediction of functionally relevant obstructive coronary disease. If FFR <0.75 was used, only 7.5% of the patients had both anatomically and functionally significant stenoses. Conclusion In patients with normal SPECT who undergo FFR measurements because of persistent complaints, the prevalence of stenoses which are both anatomically and functionally significant is low. This suggests that the prevalence of false-negative SPECT is (very) low.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yokota, S., Borren, N., Mouden, M., Timmer, J. R., Knollema, S., Jager, P. L., & Ottervanger, J. P. (2018). Anatomically and functionally relevant coronary stenoses in patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography but persistent stable angina. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, 19(12), 1327–1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free