Atypical antipsychotic adherence is associated with lower inpatient utilization and cost in bipolar I disorder

13Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: This study explored the association between medication adherence to oral atypical antipsychotics (AAP) and both psychiatric hospitalization and associated costs in bipolar I disorder (BD-I) in a real-world setting. Materials and methods: This retrospective study used the Truven Health MarketScan Medicaid, Commercial, and Medicare Supplemental Claims Databases. Adults were identified if they had BD-I and initiated an AAP treatment during the study identification period (July 1, 2015–June 30, 2016 for Medicaid, July 1, 2015–March 31, 2016 for Commercial and Medicare Supplemental) and had ≥6-month continuous enrollment before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the first day of treatment. Medication adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and grouped as: fully-adherent (PDC ≥80%), partially-adherent (40% ≤ PDC <80%), and non-adherent (PDC <40%). Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to estimate the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and costs during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: The final sample consisted of 5,892 (32.0%) fully-adherent, 4,246 (23.1%) partially-adherent, and 8,250 (44.9%) non-adherent patients. The adjusted rate of psychiatric hospitalization during the follow-up period was lower in the fully-adherent (6.0%) vs partially- (8.3%) or non-adherent (8.8%) groups (p < 0.001). Using the fully-adherent cohort as the reference group, the odds of psychiatric hospitalization were significantly higher for the partially-adherent (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.23–1.64) and non-adherent (1.51; 1.33–1.71) cohorts. The mean adjusted psychiatric hospitalization cost over 6 months among hospitalized patients was lower for the fully-adherent cohort ($11,748), than the partially-adherent ($15,051 p = 0.002) or non-adherent cohorts ($13,170, not statistically significant). Limitations: The medication adherence measures relied on prescription claims data, not actual use. Conclusions: In the treatment of BD-I, better medication adherence to AAP was associated with fewer psychiatric hospitalizations. Among hospitalized patients, fully-adherent patients had statistically significantly lower psychiatric costs than partially-adherent ones. These findings suggest that improving adherence to AAP in BD-I may be a valuable goal from both clinical and economic perspectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broder, M. S., Greene, M., Chang, E., Hartry, A., Yan, T., & Yermilov, I. (2019). Atypical antipsychotic adherence is associated with lower inpatient utilization and cost in bipolar I disorder. Journal of Medical Economics, 22(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1543188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free