Bias in clinical research

80Citations
Citations of this article
280Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The quality of a clinical study depends on internal and external factors. Studies have internal validity when, random error apart, reported differences between exposed and unexposed individuals can be attributed only to the exposure under investigation. Internal validity may be affected by bias, that is, by any systematic error that occurs in the design or in the conduction of a clinical research. Here we focus on two major categories of bias: selection bias and information bias. We describe three types of selection biases (incidence-prevalence bias, loss-to-follow-up bias, and publication bias) and a series of information biases (i.e. misclassification bias - recall bias, interviewer bias, observer bias, and regression dilution bias - and lead-time bias). © 2008 International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tripepi, G., Jager, K. J., Dekker, F. W., Wanner, C., & Zoccali, C. (2008). Bias in clinical research. Kidney International, 73(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free