A Preterm infant with hypovolemic shock: Should infants be examined twice or is once enough?

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Shock in newborns and preterm infants carries significant morbidity and mortality risks unless there is early recognition and adequate treatment. Signs may only be identified in the late decompensated phase with lactic acidosis, cellular disruption, and irreversible multiorgan damage. In neonates, the etiopathological origin is unique, particularly in extremely preterm infants with a complicated postnatal transition phase, an immature myocardium, and high peripheral systemic resistance. Hypovolemic shock shortly after birth is uncommon and may complicate fetomaternal or fetoplacental transfusion, abruptio placenta, intracranial hemorrhage, or capillary leak syndrome. Without a blood loss history, secondary clinical assessment may reveal the underlying etiology and facilitate targeted interventions.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alshafei, A., & Khan, A. (2021). A Preterm infant with hypovolemic shock: Should infants be examined twice or is once enough? Journal of Pediatric Research, 8(4), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.4274/jpr.galenos.2021.52297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free