A study of scab resistance in 16 apple progenies using parents with partial scab resistance

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Can. J. Plant Sci. 89:693-699. A study was conducted to examine the inheritance of partial resistance to apple scab [Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint.] using as parents a set of apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.) cultivars that show a range of field resistance to the disease, but are not known to carry any major-gene resistance. Akane, Alkmene, Antonovka, Carola, Chehalis, Goldgelbe, Katja and Summerred were used as pollen parents, and Spartan and an unnamed selection of Splendour×Gala parentage were used as seed parents in a factorial 2×8 mating design. One hundred seedlings of each family were planted in a randomized complete block design at a site with heavy annual natural scab infections. Each seedling was rated for infection severity for 3 consecutive years using a six-point categorical scale. A x2 procedure was used to estimate the contribution of each parent to field resistance (analogous to general combining ability, GCA) and the contribution of the particular male-female combination (analogous to specific combining ability, SCA). Infection severity tended to increase over the 3 yr of the study. Antonovka and Chehalis had the highest analogous GCA for resistance (defined here as absence of sporulating lesions). Specific combining ability was present in 2 of 3 yr, but was small in magnitude relative to GCA. The field resistance of a given parent tended to be a poor predictor of its breeding value. However, 13 of the 16 families had at least 30% of seedlings with a potentially useful degree of partial resistance (low severity of infection). The results are discussed in the context of breeding apples with durable scab resistance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hampson, C. R., Quamme, H. A., & Sholberg, P. L. (2009). A study of scab resistance in 16 apple progenies using parents with partial scab resistance. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89(4), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS08055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free