A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: analyzing the development of mathematical claims

3Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study introduces a framework for analyzing opportunities for mathematical reasoning (MR) in school mathematics, using MR-relevant claims and their derivation as the unit of analysis. We contend that this approach can effectively capture a broad range of opportunities for MR across various teaching situations. The framework, rooted in commognition, entails identifying necessary object-level narratives (NOLs) and the processes involved in their construction and substantiation. After theoretical development, the framework was refined through analyses of mathematics lessons in Norwegian primary school classrooms. Examples from the data illustrate how to utilize the framework in analysis and what such analyses can reveal in four typical teaching situations: the introduction of new mathematical objects, the introduction of procedures, work on exercise tasks, and work on problem-solving tasks. Drawing from the analysis of these examples, we discuss the value of the framework for analyzing MR in school mathematics and how such analysis can benefit teachers and researchers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valenta, A., Rø, K., & Klock, S. I. (2024). A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: analyzing the development of mathematical claims. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10309-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free