Development of a seroepidemiological tool for bat-borne and shrew-borne hantaviruses and its application using samples from Zambia

Abstract

Background Rodent-borne orthohantaviruses are the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Apart from the classic rodent-borne hantaviruses, numerous species of hantaviruses have been identified in shrews and bats; however, their antigenicity and pathogenicity are unknown. This study focused on developing a serological method to detect antibodies against bat-and shrew-borne hantaviruses. Methodology/Principal findings Five bat-borne (Brno, Dakrong, Quezon, Robina, and Xuan Song) and 6 shrew-borne (Asama, Altai, Cao Bang, Nova, Seewis, and Thottapalayam) viruses were selected based on the phylogenetic differences in their N proteins. The recombinant N (rN) proteins of these viruses were expressed as antigens in Vero E6 and 293T cell lines using the pCAGGS/MCS vector. Antisera against the Nus-tagged rN fusion proteins of these viruses (mouse antiBrno, Dakrong, Quezon, Robina, Xuan Song, Asama, Cao Bang, and Nova, while rabbit anti-Altai, Seewis and Thottapalayam) were also generated. Antigenic cross-reactivity was examined in antisera and rN-expressing Vero E6 cells. The rN proteins of almost all the tested viruses, except for the Quezon and Robina viruses, showed independent antigenicity. For serological screening of bat samples, 5 rNs of the bat-borne viruses were expressed together in a single transfection protocol. Similarly, 6 rNs of shrew-borne viruses were expressed. Reactivities of the mixed antigen system were also examined across the singly transfected Vero cell lines to ensure that all antigens were expressed. Using these antigens, bat serum samples collected from Zambia were screened using the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). Selected positive samples were individually tested for the respective antigens by IFAT and western blot assays using rN-expressing 293T cell lysates. Of the 1,764 bat serum samples tested, 11.4% and 17.4% were positive for bat and shrew mixed antigens, respectively. These samples showed positive reactions to the Brno, Dakrong, Quezon, Xuan Son, Robina, Asama, Altai, Cao Bang, or Thottapalayam virus antigens. Conclusions/Significance These observations suggest that the mixed-antigen screening system is useful for serological screening For Orthohantavirus infections and that bats in Zambia are likely exposed to not only bat-borne hantaviruses but also to shrew-borne hantaviruses. Author summary Advancements in scientific research tools in areas of emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases of public health importance are crucial to understanding the epidemiology of these diseases. Hantaviruses are not an exception. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) are the two main rodentborne diseases of public health importance. However, bat-and shrew-borne hantaviruses have also been reported with serological detection of Thottapalayam and Altai shrewborne hantavirus infections in humans in Sri Lanka and Thailand. Based on these recent public health discoveries, antigenic development and evaluation are part of the key components provides researchers with the first antigenic comparison between selected bat-and shrewborne hantaviruses using their rN proteins with their application in screening epidemiological basis for further scientific collaboration within research communities.