Abstract
A “parallactic view” (i.e., subjectivity in interpreting data) is an important and perhaps essential tool for formulating hypotheses, but it also represents a hazardous contam inant to be avoided in testing hypotheses. Computer simulations demonstrate that statistical testing of data that are contaminated by even a modest level of such parallax can be very misleading; probability levels are greatly distorted. An even more insidious influence of the parallactic view arises when the fundamental assumptions for a statistical test are not ade quately respected. Single-cosinor analysis, which has been used to “demonstrate” circasep tan rhythms (τ = about 7 days), lends itself to such abuse: The statistical test of the zero- amplitude hypothesis assumes that if any serial correlation is present in the data, it is due to a sinusoidal oscillation with period that is known a priori. One cannot, therefore, legitimately use this method to demonstrate the existence of such a rhythm. © 1989, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Enright, J. T. (1989). The Parallactic View, Statistical Testing, and Circular Reasoning. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 4(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/074873048900400214
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.