MULTIPLE REGRESSION AS A FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE to ANOVA in L2 RESEARCH

97Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Second language (L2) research relies heavily and increasingly on ANOVA (analysis of variance)-based results as a means to advance theory and practice. This fact alone should merit some reflection on the utility and value of ANOVA. It is possible that we could use this procedure more appropriately and, as argued here, other analyses such as multiple regression may prove to be more illuminating in certain research contexts. We begin this article with an overview of problems associated with ANOVA; some of them are inherent to the procedure, and others are tied to the way it is applied in L2 research. We then present three rationales for when researchers might turn to multiple regression in place of ANOVA. Output from ANOVA and multiple regression analyses based on published and mock-up studies are used to illustrate major points.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). MULTIPLE REGRESSION AS A FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE to ANOVA in L2 RESEARCH. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free