On Distinguishing Functional Ecology and Evolution in Cultural Theory

  • Diener P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As a legacy from Julian Steward, cultural anthropology has moved “away from the preoccupation with issues of origins that was characteristic of the earlier evolutionary outlook” (Miller and Weitz). Indeed, some have maintained that the distinction between functional ecology and evolution “dissolves” in the dynamics of ecological operations (Rappaport). However, a firm distinction is made in biological theory between the “operation” problem and the “origin” problem. This distinction between functional ecology and evolution is also emphasized by “new evolutionists” (Diener, Nonini, and Robkin 1978, 1980). In this paper, documentation is provided demonstrating that a more adequate understanding of complex systems structures, complex systems processes, temporal process, systemic history, and rapid change is available if we begin by recognizing functional ecology and evolution as “distinct, but related.” We need to return to the evolutionary viewpoint once so influential in American anthropology, and use it to complement ecological analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diener, P. (1980). On Distinguishing Functional Ecology and Evolution in Cultural Theory. Central Issues in Anthropology, 2(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cia.1980.2.2.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free