Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize

79Citations
Citations of this article
179Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research. One challenge is whether and how to normalize these metrics to account for differences across scientific fields, age (year of publication), type of document, database coverage, and other factors. We discuss the pros and cons for normalizations using different approaches. Additional challenges emerge when citation metrics need to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journals, or countries, as well as when trying to attribute credit in multiauthored papers. Different citation metrics may offer complementary insights, but one should carefully consider the assumptions that underlie their calculation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Boyack, K., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize. PLoS Biology, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free