3D conservation planning: Including aquifer protection in freshwater plans refines priorities without much additional effort

20Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Groundwater has very rarely been included in modern systematic conservation planning methods that identify key areas for protection of aquatic organisms. Three conservation plans were developed for aquatic ecosystems in the Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia using the planning software Marxan: one model for rivers and wetlands and two that consider groundwater ecosystems. The first of these groundwater inclusive models included aquifers in the initial planning process; the second retrofitted groundwater onto an existing conservation plan. The results demonstrate that, if groundwater protection was included at the planning stage, the overall land that was needed only increased marginally. When included, groundwater protection led to an emphasis on groundwater recharge zones. A posteriori inclusion of GW protections, however, yielded a 30% increase in surface area needing protection. We conclude that groundwater can be included in conservation planning but it is much more efficient to do so at the beginning of the planning process. The next step is to refine the planning methods by including data on groundwater-dependent organisms, either by genetic means or novel statistical techniques, and hence using a direct biotic signal instead of environmental surrogates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linke, S., Turak, E., Asmyhr, M. G., & Hose, G. (2019). 3D conservation planning: Including aquifer protection in freshwater plans refines priorities without much additional effort. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 29(7), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free