Strategic Compliance: Silence, "Faking it," and Confession in Teacher Reflection

  • Atkinson B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, the author considers how teacher reflection as it is represented and enacted programmatically in curriculum, professional organizations, and research has often led to teachers' strategic compliance to externally imposed notions of teacher reflection.  Conceptualizing strategic compliance as an effect of pastoral power working through disciplinary technologies to regulate and normalize teacher reflection, the author examines three features of teachers' strategic compliance documented in the reflection literature identified as silence, "faking it," and confession. This examination of three features of strategic compliance as effects of pastoral power's disciplinary technologies questions the production of teacher reflection practices that undermine the critical and transformative purposes for which reflection is endorsed. This offers possibilities for more nuanced reconsideration of how reflection is conceptualized as a site for assessment rather than a process of exploration and sustained interrogation of the meaning and reality of reflection as a collective and shared experience among educators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atkinson, B. M. (2012). Strategic Compliance: Silence, “Faking it,” and Confession in Teacher Reflection. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v28i1.319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free