One-year efficacy and safety of evolocumab in Japanese patients: A pooled analysis from the open-label extension OSLER studies

10Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in Japanese patients by up to 76% when administered with a statin. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 1 year of evolocumab in a pooled analysis of patients from the 12-week YUKAWA studies who continued into the open-label extension (OLE) OSLER studies. Methods and Results: YUKAWA-1 and YUKAWA-2 were conducted in hypercholesterolemic, high-cardiovascular-risk Japanese patients who were receiving statin therapy. Patients completing these studies were eligible for an OLE study. At OLE entry, patients were re-randomized 2: 1 to evolocumab+standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone (OSLER-1: evolocumab 420 mg monthly; OSLER-2: evolocumab 140 mg biweekly or 420 mg monthly). A 1-year analysis was performed on patients enrolled from the YUKAWA studies into OSLER. At parent-study baseline (YUKAWA-1 or YUKAWA-2 patients continuing into OSLER), mean (SD) age was 61 (10) years; 39% were female; mean (SD) baseline LDL-C (on statin) was 119.7 (33.0) mg/dL. Overall rates of adverse events were comparable between evolocumab+SOC and SOC alone. In YUKAWA patients receiving evolocumab+SOC, mean (SE) reductions in LDL-C from parent-study baseline to OLE 1 year were 69.1% (1.2%; OSLER-1) and 65.1% (2.2%; OSLER-2). Conclusions: In a pooled 1-year analysis of Japanese patients in the ongoing OSLER studies, treatment with evolocumab+SOC was well tolerated and resulted in sustained LDL-C reductions at 1 year.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hirayama, A., Yamashita, S., Inomata, H., Kassahun, H., Cyrille, M., Ruzza, A., … Teramoto, T. (2017). One-year efficacy and safety of evolocumab in Japanese patients: A pooled analysis from the open-label extension OSLER studies. Circulation Journal, 81(7), 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free