Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician

627Citations
Citations of this article
457Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Real-world studies have become increasingly important in providing evidence of treatment effectiveness in clinical practice. While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the “gold standard” for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new therapeutic agents, necessarily strict inclusion and exclusion criteria mean that trial populations are often not representative of the patient populations encountered in clinical practice. Real-world studies may use information from electronic health and claims databases, which provide large datasets from diverse patient populations, and/or may be observational, collecting prospective or retrospective data over a long period of time. They can therefore provide information on the long-term safety, particularly pertaining to rare events, and effectiveness of drugs in large heterogeneous populations, as well as information on utilization patterns and health and economic outcomes. This review focuses on how evidence from real-world studies can be utilized to complement data from RCTs to gain a more complete picture of the advantages and disadvantages of medications as they are used in practice. Funding: Sanofi US, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blonde, L., Khunti, K., Harris, S. B., Meizinger, C., & Skolnik, N. S. (2018, November 1). Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician. Advances in Therapy. Springer Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free