Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: A naturalistic study

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In order to assess the concordance between self-rating and clinician's assessment tools of depression, as well as factors involved in the differences between auto and hetero evaluation, 198 depressed in-patients were assessed at admission and at discharge using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (10-item version, MADRS) and the self-rating scale Symptoms CheckList (90-item version, SCL-90). We found that about 18% of patients overestimated and about 15% underestimated their depressive symptomatology (SCL-90 depression subscale) relative to the psychiatrist's assessment. Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of personality disorders and previous history of psychiatric disorders predicted the overestimating group. Discriminant analysis showed that approximately 75% of participants were correctly classified when previous history of psychiatric disorders, presence of personality disorders and age were entered separately into the equation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorz, S., Borgherini, G., Conforti, D., Scarso, C., & Magni, G. (2004). Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: A naturalistic study. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1348/1476083041839349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free